| Year | Between First and Second Quintile | Between Second and Middle Quintile | Between Middle and Fourth Quintile | Between Fourth and Highest Quintile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17955 | 33005 | 52265 | 81960 |
| 2001 | 17960 | 33312 | 53000 | 83500 |
| 2002 | 17916 | 33377 | 53151 | 84016 |
| 2003 | 17984 | 34000 | 54440 | 86860 |
| 2004 | 18500 | 34738 | 55331 | 88030 |
| 2005 | 19178 | 36000 | 57658 | 91705 |
| 2006 | 20032 | 37771 | 60000 | 97030 |
| 2007 | 20300 | 39100 | 62000 | 100000 |
| 2008 | 20712 | 39000 | 62750 | 100250 |
| 2009 | 20450 | 38530 | 61800 | 100000 |
| 2010 | 20000 | 38040 | 61720 | 100065 |
| 2011 | 20260 | 38515 | 62434 | 101577 |
| 2012 | 20593 | 39736 | 64554 | 104086 |
| 2013 | 20900 | 40187 | 65502 | 105900 |
| 2014 | 21430 | 41167 | 68200 | 112254 |
The following table is the inflation adjusted version of the above table in year 2000 dollars:
| Year | Between First and Second Quintile | Between Second and Middle Quintile | Between Middle and Fourth Quintile | Between Fourth and Highest Quintile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17955 | 33005 | 52265 | 81960 |
| 2001 | 17677 | 32217 | 51257 | 82185 |
| 2002 | 17221 | 31771 | 50593 | 80755 |
| 2003 | 16964 | 31606 | 50606 | 81932 |
| 2004 | 16893 | 31689 | 50475 | 80383 |
| 2005 | 16936 | 31791 | 50917 | 80985 |
| 2006 | 17259 | 32259 | 51244 | 83598 |
| 2007 | 17013 | 32770 | 51962 | 83810 |
| 2008 | 16723 | 31489 | 50665 | 80943 |
| 2009 | 16578 | 31235 | 50099 | 81066 |
| 2010 | 15958 | 30353 | 49245 | 79841 |
| 2011 | 15710 | 29865 | 48412 | 78763 |
| 2012 | 15639 | 30178 | 49026 | 79049 |
| 2013 | 15638 | 30069 | 49010 | 79238 |
| 2014 | 15782 | 30317 | 50226 | 82669 |
The table below shows the above table in terms of delta from the year 2000 values:
| Year | Between First and Second Quintile | Between Second and Middle Quintile | Between Middle and Fourth Quintile | Between Fourth and Highest Quintile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | -278 | -788 | -1008 | 225 |
| 2002 | -734 | -1234 | -1672 | -1205 |
| 2003 | -991 | -1399 | -1659 | -28 |
| 2004 | -1062 | -1316 | -1790 | -1577 |
| 2005 | -1019 | -1214 | -1348 | -975 |
| 2006 | -696 | -746 | -1021 | 1638 |
| 2007 | -942 | -235 | -303 | 1850 |
| 2008 | -1232 | -1516 | -1600 | -1017 |
| 2009 | -1377 | -1770 | -2166 | -894 |
| 2010 | -1997 | -2652 | -3020 | -2119 |
| 2011 | -2245 | -3140 | -3853 | -3197 |
| 2012 | -2316 | -2827 | -3239 | -2911 |
| 2013 | -2317 | -2936 | -3255 | -2722 |
| 2014 | -2173 | -2688 | -2039 | 709 |
Finally, the following link is the graph of the above table data:
http://i.imgur.com/SSNymgo.png
What we see is that compared to 2000, income The highest quintile is the only one to recover from the Great Recession. Despite all the legislation by the Democrats to help the poor, economically it has all ended up helping the richest of our population instead.
